GTX580 OC, 06:31712,Vantage:P30893 기록. GTX580 벤치 및 사진

테스트 시스템 사양

Sistemul de test “este” de fapt sistemele de test pentru ca am folosit doua platforme pentru a putea include si rezultate in 3DMark 2001.

• CPU – Intel Core i7 920 D0 lapped, Core 2 duo E8400 E0
  
• MB – Gigabyte X58A-UD3R v 1.0 (F6 BIOS), Asus Rampage Extreme
  
• VGA – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (reference)
  
• RAM – 3×2GB Kingston DDR3 2000 CL9 / 3×1GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3 1600 CL8 / 2×1GB Super Talent ProjectX DDR3 1800 CL7
  
• HDD – Western Digital WD6400AAKS / Samsung 103 UJ
  
• PSU – Corsair HX1000W
• Racire – Thermalright VenomousX / TRUE Black / Noctua NH-D14
  
• TIM – PK-1 / Chill Factor 3
  

Ventilatoare folosite:

• Scythe Slip Stream 140mm (1700RPM)
• Scythe Slip Stream SY1225SL12H (1600RPM)
• San Ace 120 9SG1212P1G03 (6000RPM)
• Thermaltake PLA12025S12HH-LV (2600RPM)

Phase 1.

• common stock (772MHz GPU / 1000MHz GDDR)
• cooling stock
• speed auto
• default voltage (1.035v)
• ~ 23c ambient

Phase 2

. .

•  910MHz GPU / 1000MHz GDDR
• cooling stock
• RPM 100%
•  voltage - the maximum allowed by MSI Afterburner (1138mV)
• ~ 23c ambient

Phase 3

• 980MHz GPU / 1200MHz GDDR
• Thermalright True Black
• 2600rpm
• Voltage - maximum MSI permid Afterburner (1138mV)
• ~ 25c ambient

Phase 4

• 1020-1050MHz GPU / 1200MHz GDDR +
• Thermalright True Black Thermalright True Black
• 6000RPM 6000rpm
• voltaj 1.280 mV max 1280 mV max voltage
• 7-10c ambient 7-10c ambient

사용된 소프트웨어:

• 3DMark 2003 3DMark 2003
• 3DMark 2005 3DMark 2005
• 3DMark 2006 3DMark 2006
• 3DMark Vantage 3DMark Vantage
• Far Cry 2 Far Cry 2
• Crysis Warhead Crysis Warhead
• Aliens vs Predator v1.3 Aliens vs Predator v1.3
• Metro 2033 v1.2 bench 2033 Metro bench v1.2
• Furmark 1.8.2 1.8.2 Furmark
• Msi combustor MSI combustor
• Windows 7 x64 Ultimate Windows 7 Ultimate x64
• Windows XP pro 32bit Windows XP pro 32bit
• CPU-Z 1.55 CPU-Z 1.55
• GPU-Z 0.48 GPU-Z 0.48
• MSI Afterburner 2.1 beta 4 Afterburner MSI 2.1 beta 4
• Nvidia Inspector 1.94 Nvidia Inspector 1.94
• Nvidia 262.99 driver Nvidia driver 262.99

VRM's Analysis

VRM uses quality components and is largely identical to that of GTX 480, with six three-phase mosfet RDSon Low (low impedance) per phase and two phases for the same memory type mosferi two per phase.

 We see the back of the PCB (picture no. 2) tantalum capacitors that have performed very well in low temperature conditions. Inducers is observed above (first picture) to be installed in places with solid electrolyte capacitors, which in his case and GTX 480 are not missing.  I can not believe this is a minus, especially considering the board's behavior in every case overclocking enthusiasts will supplement the lack of trouble-free VRM capabilities.

Of course I'm excited that I want a very solid VRM can "fuel and a tractor," but the six phases of the reference design were performed exemplary.  But one thing this could be improved VRM, but we'll talk about it in the next chapter.

  LOAD voltage specified by the manufacturer in stock is the measure with meter 1035mv and I found exactly this value, additional stability to very high loads (above 1.3v) was very good. Motherboard has three fuses which will protect the plate in case overload or short circuit protection in case the other fails.

  Also in the VRM's are also found to have three integrated power monitoring role and can fulfill the role of limiting and protection for your video card in case of overloading or exceeding certain threshold values. All in the next chapter we will analyze this aspect, because the view of this we think that could also have a negative influence or mislead the introduction of these limitations that could have a negative impact on performance or temperature. Mai jos avem o descriere a acestor chipuri: Below is a description of these ways:

쿨링 시스템 관련

I said the big problem of cooling systems for high-end graphics cards underdimmensionnement cooler. A cooler nothing will build quality and very effective if it lacks architectural surface dissipation. Do not forget we are talking here of TDP's giant heat sink should be kept in rein to small pots, and on top of them and we Inaudible.  So no matter how well they are made we can not expect miracles.  You'll notice two pictures on this page will be "more than suggestive."

  Though I would have liked to make a comparison with HDT heatsink on your GTX 480 I had the opportunity. Well, I would have liked to do more tests and comparisons but in a short time is hardly possible. Cooling GTX 580 is used to ship type comportatre chamber and had a good, but as I said, in the absence of a comparison database to limit me to show you the results, including high voltage, to see and how they behave in these new cooling conditions.

 Chapter VRM mention of an issue to be improved, in fact, are two: metal plate to deal with VRM's cool though is massive and the pleadings, is not actively cooled, and this will inflenta GPU temperature.  Things are not simple in the case of a compact design and therefore do not consider this design a minus.The second aspect is related to temperature monitoring VRM's, considering that the PWM controller (CHILE 8266) has advanced features for clearing heat and power.

At least with the current software does not have a mosfet or even monitoring the temperature of the PCB, which is very odd. I saw a Volterra VRM is possible to monitor the temperature for each phase separately, extremely useful and helped me in discovering the problems of cooling of these areas.  I hope to be just a software issue, and to remedy in the future.

 Flatness is very good and the grip pressure system was slightly increased compared to the GTX 480.

전력 소모량과 발열

23 ° C ambient / MSI Kombustor / 1138mV / max rpm - 54 ° C / max 400W

23 ° C ambient / FurMark / 1138mV / max rpm - 54 ° C / 407w max

23 ° C ambient / MSI Kombustor / 1035mV / auto rpm - 80 ° C / 415w max

23 ° C ambient / FurMark / 1035mV / auto rpm - 80 ° C / 420w max

23 ° C ambient / Crysis / 1035mV / auto rpm - 81 ° C / 490w max

23 ° C ambient / Crysis / 1138mV / max rpm - 69 ° C / max 550W

23 ° C ambient / 3DMark Vantage / 1138mV / max rpm - 68 oC

• 21 ° C ambient / 3DMark Vantage / 1280mV (hardware voltmod) / max rpm - 79 ° C / 612w max

7 ° C ambient / 3DMark Vantage / 1350mV (hardware voltmod) / max rpm / TRUE + 6000rpm - 35 ° C / 670w max

We can easily deduce that the limitation of power is scheduled software and software-type Fur, with very little relevance, as they are good only tested VGA coolers.  Make sure that a Fur stability does not mean that the card is stable in all programs.  I can remember or Unigine Vantage, to give just two examples, they will not be stable at the settings needed stability in Fur. Those of you who are familiar with forum lab501 have seen a lot of tests done by me in connection with the cooling influence of VRM's in the latest case of plates or different tests or temperature stability.

I wanted to do many more tests, but two days is even less to do some overclocking tests, but on that part if I lengthen the test article not ever finish, especially with the "talent" my " writer " ! !

 I can not draw conclusions about the complete cooling system in the absence of comparison with other coolers, but it's based heatsink Vapor Chamber technology and OV performed well, especially considering the size of small.

Consumption of those 1350mV 3DMark Vantage GPU Score with shows that not much would be the performance or power penalties in important applications, but this needs a more detailed study in order to draw full conclusions. That limit current / power we can consider a good thing, protecting the plate, the Fur consumption is exceedingly high compared to celealte applications even at a lower voltage, as demonstrated in tests and my articles.

GPU 전압 조절

최신 버전의 MSI, NVIDA 에프터버너 1.94 소프트웨어가 GTX580의 전압 조절이 가능하다 하지만 1138mV이상은 안된다.
그래서 직접적인 하드웨어 전압 조절이 필요했다
PWM chip GPU VRM 은 CHILE 8266 응 아래 사진과 같이 생겼고 진보된 컨트롤능력과 보호가 가능하다.

표시된곳을 연결하여 저항을 줄여서 1350mV를 얻었고 아무런 제한이 발생하지 않았다고 하네요.

아래 사진은 3DMark 2003 Nature를 메모리 클럭 1300MHz로 돌리는 장면이다. 테스트에서는 1250MHz로 하였는데 안전성과 더모든걸 신경쓸 더 많은 시간이 없었기 때문이다.

게임 결과

벤치마크 결과

3DMark 2005 - 1050MHZ

3DMark 2003 - 1035MHZ

3DMark Vantage - 1020MHZ

3DMark 2006 - 1025MHZ

GeForce GTX 580 and 3DMark 2001

We had a little more time (for testing) from the previous article and I could not resist the temptation to see how it behaves GTX 580 in 3DMark 2001. Unfortunately, the benchmark is old, almost no one puts him in mind in May, new drivers are not productive and in addition the program (especially Nature) knows not to use the huge power of the current GPU.  Although I could use the last driver LOD, scaling FPSs in Nature GPU frequency memories was almost zero, which is exemplified in the following.

GTX 580 (770MHz / 1000MHz) / 4950MHz CPU - 1427 fps Nature

GTX 580 (1015MHz / 1200MHz) / 495MHz CPU - 1456 fps Nature

GTX 580 (1015MHz / 1200MHz) / 4950MHz CPU - 1446 fps Nature / LOD = 3

Tests were repeated several times and the only thing that influence the outcome of Nature was the CPU frequency.

. .

• 3DMark 2001 / 5111MHz CPU/1050MHz GPU / 1250MHz GDDR / 19.5 oC ambient – 102956

Conclusions

. .

Improvements to the GTX 480 are very high and these things can be seen especially in benchmarks, that is exactly what we are interested in this article. Scaling the voltage and temperature are very good for a GPU so complex.  Furthermore, the results are very good and can even say that I have exceeded expectations. Of course I said in the article as there are several aspects to which we could make improvements, and enthusiasm is something normal that I want things to be close to perfection. However, freecvente stable over 1000MHz using cooled air is something impressive, something that GTX 480 could not dream ...

. .

Screenshots

추천 과 댓글은 블로거에게 큰 힘이 됩니다^^
그냥 손가락을 누르시면 되요^^&